Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-08-02 [2010/08/03 16:27]
smayr
+++ ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-08-02 [2011/05/10 12:22] (current)
smayr
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Software Development Meeting 2010-Aug-02 ==
-Notes relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]].
+[[ezfit:software_meeting_notes|Software Meeting Notes]] relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]].
 Attendees:
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
     * BTE675DP Fitting (China)
     * HearingCentral
-    * Newson
+    * Newson (France)
-    * Newsound
+    * Newsound(China)
-    * Sonitech
+    * Sonitech (USA)
-    * TransEar
+    * TransEar (USA)
-    * Vista HI & A
+    * Vista HI & A (USA)
   * Challenges:
@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
     * User documentation.
     * Translation (in some instances).
 ==== Custom Branding ====
 It includes all of private labeling features, and in addition includes special manufacturer code  and custom software so there is no reading of Audina (or other custom brand) products.
@@ Line 61: / Line 60: @@
     * Audina
     * Auditiva
-    * Sonetik
+    * Sonetik (Switzerland)
-    * PHSI
+    * PHSI (USA)
   * Challenges:
@@ Line 70: / Line 69: @@
     * Provide custom software for QC to test instruments.
     * Provide Order Entry method for dealing with repairs.
-    * Provide coordination with all affected parties (Production, QC, Software, Sales).
+    * Provide coordination with all affected parties (Production, Quality Control, Order Entry, Software Development, Audiology, and Sales).
     * Design processes with forward and backward compatibility in mind (i.e. maintain compatibility with ezFIT4 and ezFIT5 platforms).
@@ Line 81: / Line 80: @@
   * Requires
-    * Supplier interface.
+    * Chip supplier provide manufacturing ID code.
-    * Interdepartmental coordination (production impact, QC, OE, SW and Audiology support factors).
+    * Interdepartmental coordination (impact in Production, Quality Control, Order Entry, Software Development, and Audiology support factors).
     * Software development for customization.
     * QC customization for software.
@@ Line 132: / Line 131: @@
    * Product & fitting ranges
  * Meet to discuss and further define above algorithms when Steve is next in town.
 == Completed Actions ==
+Custom Branding
+  * Use Audina manufacturer ID code for all products, but differentiate brands by scratch memory code (assigned at Audina internally).  Read this code to determine to whether give access to instrument settings.
+    * Issue: Intuition 2 / Simplex 2P's circuit does not have enough scratch memory to support this feature.
+    * Suggestion: Phase out Intuition 2 / Simplex 2P (DigitalOne2 circuit) in favor of a Spin based product (Intuition 2FC) or SpinNR based product (Intuition 2ER).
+^ Product        ^ Cost (Custom) ^ Cost (BTE) ^ Avg MSRP  ^
+| Intuition 2    | $52.71        | $85        | $225      |
+| Intuition 2FC  | $55.21        | $85        | $250      |
+| Intuition 2ER  | $56.21        | N/A        | $275      |
+  * Use a separate QC machine for branding instruments, then process the instrument as normal (with additional checks for correct branding).
+  * Route all orders (from different brands) to a single database (i.e. using custom ezFIT software should point to same shared databased, to avoid having orders in separate databases).
+  * Provide single-day registration code in the ezFIT software for dealing with issues out in the field.
+Algorithms
+  * Prescriptions (and targets):
+    * Implement Fitting Formula v.2, as currently used in ezFIT4.
+    * Implement Fitting Formula v.3 for Intellio, and design formula for other products (retrofit them).
+  * Autofits
+    * Implement current ezFIT4 autofits that work well with Fitting Formula v.2.
+    * Implement current ezFIT4 autofits used for Intellio that work well with Fitting Formula v.3.
+Solutions Guide
+  * Implement current ezFIT4 Solutions Guide.
 == Conclusion ==
   * Next meeting: Aug 16, 2010, 2pm