Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-06-21 [2010/06/23 11:56] smayr |
ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-06-21 [2011/05/10 12:21] (current) smayr [Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-21] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-21 == | == Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-21 == | ||
| - | Notes relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]]. | + | [[ezfit: |
| Attendees: | Attendees: | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| * Left: 20, 40, 42, 45, 42, 40, 60, 65, 68, 70 | * Left: 20, 40, 42, 45, 42, 40, 60, 65, 68, 70 | ||
| * Right: 20, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 75, 75, 72, 70 | * Right: 20, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 75, 75, 72, 70 | ||
| - | * Details: Issue with autofit not matching targets with FLX in a closed dome. < | + | * Details: Issue with autofit not matching targets with FLX in a closed dome. From Steve' |
| It appears the matching (aka auto adjusting) algorithm works OK | It appears the matching (aka auto adjusting) algorithm works OK | ||
| for Intuition CICs, Mini Canals, FLX Open, and Sparo Open cases. | for Intuition CICs, Mini Canals, FLX Open, and Sparo Open cases. | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
| especially if someone is counting on the autofit) there is also an additional problem | especially if someone is counting on the autofit) there is also an additional problem | ||
| when used with Claraijust. Presently the EQs are not centered in their range after the | when used with Claraijust. Presently the EQs are not centered in their range after the | ||
| - | matching algorithm has done its job. This can cause a problem as the Bump, TIlt and Gain | + | matching algorithm has done its job. This can cause a problem as the Bump, Tilt and Gain |
| process won't have any adjustment room to do the optimization. | process won't have any adjustment room to do the optimization. | ||