Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-06-21 [2010/06/23 11:47]
smayr
ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-06-21 [2011/05/10 12:21] (current)
smayr [Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-21]
Line 1: Line 1:
 == Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-21 == == Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-21 ==
  
-Notes relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]].+[[ezfit:software_meeting_notes|Software Meeting Notes]] relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]].
  
 Attendees: Attendees:
Line 11: Line 11:
   * AJ   * AJ
   * Siegwart   * Siegwart
- 
 == Software Review == == Software Review ==
   * Fitting   * Fitting
-    * Graphing demonstration and discussion.   +    * Graphing review and discussion.   
-      * Can paint regions, do spline curves, etc.   +      * Demonstrated that ComponentOne Chart for WPF can paint regions (for displaying fitting ranges), do spline curves (for targets and response curves), etc.   
-      * General consensus that this graphing tool will do what we need it to provided that the axes can be log scale to match ANSI print standard. +      * Arrived to general consensus that this graphing component will do what we need it to provided that the axes can be log scale to match ANSI print standard. 
-    * Super-controls:  occlusion management, overall gain, feeback management tool, and adaptation+    * Need to develop Super-controls (for Quick Adjustments screen):   
 +      * Occlusion management
 +      * Overall gain
 +      * Feeback management tool
 +      * Adaptation manager (Acclimatization).
 == Suggested Actions == == Suggested Actions ==
  
Line 38: Line 41:
 For Barbara: For Barbara:
   * Send Glenn audiogram that was trouble fitting from Bekah (Audigence).   * Send Glenn audiogram that was trouble fitting from Bekah (Audigence).
 +    * Left: 20, 40, 42, 45, 42, 40, 60, 65, 68, 70
 +    * Right: 20, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 75, 75, 72, 70
 +    * Details: Issue with autofit not matching targets with FLX in a closed dome. From Steve's email:<file>
 +It appears the matching (aka auto adjusting) algorithm works OK 
 +for Intuition CICs, Mini Canals, FLX Open, and Sparo Open cases. 
 +All others need help
 + 
 +The problem is relatively mild for Intuition Canals and Half shell configurations.
 + 
 +It gets real bad for I12 FSS and Super 60 cases, and of course FLX OTE (closed), 
 +Earhook, as well as Sparo 12 Earhook, OTE closed
 + 
 +In all cases the greatest errors are in the low frequency region.
 + 
 +In addition to the basic matching requirement (which effects these products in general - 
 +especially if someone is counting on the autofit) there is also an additional problem 
 +when used with Claraijust. Presently the EQs are not centered in their range after the 
 +matching algorithm has done its job. This can cause a problem as the Bump, Tilt and Gain 
 +process won't have any adjustment room to do the optimization.
 + 
 +I also noticed that there is a receiver model error for the Sparo 12. When the OTE 
 +configuration is used with a closed dome the receiver model needs to reflect the 
 +increased Low Frequency content, at present it doesn't...it seems to just keep the 
 +thin tube Open model in place.</file>
  
 For Glenn/Barbara: For Glenn/Barbara: