Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-06-21 [2010/06/23 11:43]
smayr created
+++ ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-06-21 [2011/05/10 12:21] (current)
smayr [Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-21]
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-21 ==
-Notes relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]].
+[[ezfit:software_meeting_notes|Software Meeting Notes]] relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]].
 Attendees:
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
   * AJ
   * Siegwart
 == Software Review ==
   * Fitting
-    * Graphing demonstration and discussion.
+    * Graphing review and discussion.
-      * Can paint regions, do spline curves, etc.
+      * Demonstrated that ComponentOne Chart for WPF can paint regions (for displaying fitting ranges), do spline curves (for targets and response curves), etc.
-      * General consensus that this graphing tool will do what we need it to provided that the axes can be log scale to match ANSI print standard.
+      * Arrived to general consensus that this graphing component will do what we need it to provided that the axes can be log scale to match ANSI print standard.
-    * Super-controls:  occlusion management, overall gain, feeback management tool, and adaptation
+    * Need to develop Super-controls (for Quick Adjustments screen):
+      * Occlusion management.
+      * Overall gain.
+      * Feeback management tool.
+      * Adaptation manager (Acclimatization).
 == Suggested Actions ==
 For Barbara, Steve, Glenn, Dale and Paul:
-  * Prescription, targets, autofit/first fit, solution guides, product & fitting ranges, super controls and acclimatization
+  * Develop strategies and algorithms for the following:
-  * Meeting to discuss these and further define when Steve is next in town.
+    * Prescription
+    * Targets
+    * Autofit/First-fit
+    * Solution Guides
+    * Product & fitting ranges
+    * Quick Adjustments Super-controls
+    * Acclimatization.
+    * Occlusion control.
+  * Meet to discuss and further define above algorithms when Steve is next in town.
 For AJ:
-  * Priority List
+  * Setup Priority List for ezFIT 4.x.
 For Barbara:
-  * Send Glenn audio that was trouble fitting from Bekah
+  * Send Glenn audiogram that was trouble fitting from Bekah (Audigence).
+    * Left: 20, 40, 42, 45, 42, 40, 60, 65, 68, 70
+    * Right: 20, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 75, 75, 72, 70
+    * Details: Issue with autofit not matching targets with FLX in a closed dome. From Steve's email:<file>
+It appears the matching (aka auto adjusting) algorithm works OK
+for Intuition CICs, Mini Canals, FLX Open, and Sparo Open cases.
+All others need help
+The problem is relatively mild for Intuition Canals and Half shell configurations.
+It gets real bad for I12 FSS and Super 60 cases, and of course FLX OTE (closed),
+Earhook, as well as Sparo 12 Earhook, OTE closed
+In all cases the greatest errors are in the low frequency region.
+In addition to the basic matching requirement (which effects these products in general -
+especially if someone is counting on the autofit) there is also an additional problem
+when used with Claraijust. Presently the EQs are not centered in their range after the
+matching algorithm has done its job. This can cause a problem as the Bump, Tilt and Gain
+process won't have any adjustment room to do the optimization.
+I also noticed that there is a receiver model error for the Sparo 12. When the OTE
+configuration is used with a closed dome the receiver model needs to reflect the
+increased Low Frequency content, at present it doesn't...it seems to just keep the
+thin tube Open model in place.</file>
 For Glenn/Barbara:
-  * Do NAL and compare for EQ centering matching targets and snapshots
+  * Perform NAL-NL1 fitting, and compare for EQ centering matching targets and snapshots.
 == Completed Actions ==
@@ Line 41: / Line 75: @@
   * Next meeting: Jul 05, 2010, 2pm