Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-06-07 [2010/06/09 10:21]
smayr
ezfit:dev:software_meeting_2010-06-07 [2011/05/10 12:21] (current)
smayr [Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-07]
Line 1: Line 1:
 == Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-07 == == Software Development Meeting 2010-Jun-07 ==
  
-Notes relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]].+[[ezfit:software_meeting_notes|Software Meeting Notes]] relevant to [[ezfit:5.0 Milestones|ezFIT 5.0 Milestones]].
  
 Attendees: Attendees:
Line 8: Line 8:
   * Paul   * Paul
   * Barbara   * Barbara
 +  * Steve
   * Joel   * Joel
   * AJ   * AJ
-  * Steve 
   * Siegwart   * Siegwart
 +== Software Review ==
 +  * No datalog support.
 +  * Switching to different components (moving from Telerik to ComponeOne).
 +  * Now there is audiogram support.
 +  * Walkthrough of software aw it is at this time.
 +  * Paul likes the color change as mouse over.
 +  * Fitting screen eliminated the buttons and provided fast info.  
 == Suggested Actions == == Suggested Actions ==
-No log support, switching to diff components  +  * Products: 
-Now there is audiogram support +    Filter by tabs for different styles. 
-Walk through of sw aw it is at this time +    Filter by technology/environment. 
- +    Extra tab with all the check boxes so that you can choose multiple styles and technology for filtering.  
-Paul likes the color change as mouse over +      * Product specs
- +      * Product image
-Combo box  +      * Fitting ranges overlayed with the patient audiogram.
- +
-Filter by tabs for different styles +
-Filter by technology/environment +
-Extra tab with all the check boxes so that you can choose multiple styles and technology for filtering. +
-On this tab would be fitting ranges overlayed with the audiogram to help with  +
- +
-Fitting screen eliminated the buttons and provided fast info  +
-Quick Adjustments: +
- Super controls and items such as adaptation, occlusion mgr, etc.  These need to be fine tailored+
- +
-Gain under fine adjustments:  come up with a way to demo both right and left.  These are not standard controls so they would probably have to be coded +
- +
-Wpf studio (get graphical interface going and then can craft it)  Marketing did the images and then these were put on for controls  +
- +
-Sebotek screen shots-Steve action.   +
-Mark was going to see about getting screen shots to show an example.   +
- +
-Use of icons for representing buttons.  Need coordination with marketing for overall look and feel (colors, etc) +
- +
-Scale back/remove pink change background to pink +
- +
-Fitting screen-  +
- +
-Languages, localization  not for April 2011 release.  It is a fairly complex process.  Tools will be built for the translation portion to be handled.    If a requirement, then we would need to address this issue.  How quicly would it be to implement it after that?   +
- +
-Skins-priority is set not for the April release. +
- +
-Goal = functionality and getting the first set of instruments on the release, but the in the design process these are being kept in mind. +
- +
-Link for memories need a new  term for same side memory link +
-Perhaps highlight the memories that you want to link +
- +
-Curves +
-Rigt ear or left ear for fitting.  That is a fitting selection versus a display selection.    Want to have a way to simultaneously display 2 different curves for the same ear. +
- +
- +
-ACTIONS from last meeting +
-Barbara (puretone threshold average)  get the formulas for 2 and 3 freq to Sieg. +
- +
-Clarujust summary data is complete +
-  +
-Impedance:  B get graphs +
- +
-Rename Autofit to First Fit? +
-Need to figure out the best implementation of acclimatization +
- +
- +
-Where do you put the hearing aid configuration and pt information factors that impact the fitting such as dome type, tubing style, etc. +
- +
-Put on pt information section access to acclim level, pre fitting information +
-If no information is in there when the provider goes to do an autofit, a box pops up to gather that information (which will populate back to that pre fitting info). +
- +
-Solultion:  pt information acclimatization+
  
-Do dump of datapoints from the graphs  to compare with verifit ( for our purposes)+  * Fitting:  
 +    * Quick Adjustments. These need to be fine tailored: 
 +      * Super controls. 
 +      * Adaptation manager. 
 +      * Occlusion manager. 
 +    * Gain/Equalizers: Come up with way to demo both right and left.  These are not standard controls, so they would probably have to be coded. 
 +    * Link for memories needs a new term for same side memory link. Perhaps highlight the memories that you want to link. 
 +    * Curves:  
 +      * Right ear or left ear for fitting.  That is a fitting selection versus a display selection.     
 +      * Simultaneously display 2 different curves for the same ear. 
 +    * Get formulas for pure tone threshold average 2 and 3 freq to Sieg (Barbara action). 
 +    * Allow dumping of chart datapoints to compare with Verifit (for our purposes).
  
-Directional support:  how are we going to display polar plotsetc.  thoughts:  put it so that it displays over current chart.+  * User Interface: 
 +    * Design graphical interface, then add functionality to it.  It is possible for Marketing to create imagescolors, and theme, then these can be added to the controls.   
 +      * Obtain screen shots from other manufacturers: 
 +        * Sebotek (Steve & Marc action).   
 +        * Other manufacturers (Barbara & Paul action). 
 +    * Use of icons for representing buttons.  Need coordination with marketing for overall look and feel (colors, etc).
  
-Look at options for ways to handle all the compression data.+  * To discuss: 
 +    * Directional support:  how are we going to display polar plots, etc.  Thoughts:  put it so that it displays over current chart. 
 +    * Review options to handle all the compression data. 
 +    * Clarujust access still in debate. 
 +    * Solutions:  patient information acclimatization 
 +      * Need to figure out the best implementation of acclimatization 
 +    * Review where to place factors that impact the fitting such as: 
 +      * Hearing aid configuration  
 +        * Dome type 
 +        * Tubing style 
 +      * Patient information 
 +        * Acclimatization level 
 +        * Pre-fitting information
  
-Two things found for drag and drop.  +  * Graphing component: 
 +    * Make data sets for graphing purposes(Steve action)   
 +    * Review graph splines support: (AJ action) 
 +      * Does it have what we need for displaying the graphs for the various product and components?
  
-Clarujust access  still in debate+== Completed Actions ==
  
-AJ ACTION:  work with graph splines what is built in and does it have what we need for displaying the graphs for the various product and components.+  * Fitting: 
 +    * Rename Autofit to First Fit?  --- //[[smayr@audina.net|Siegwart Mayr]] 2010/06/18 17:10// 
 +    * If no information is in there when the provider goes to do an autofit, a box pops up to gather that information (which will populate back to that pre fitting info) --- //[[smayr@audina.net|Siegwart Mayr]] 2010/06/18 17:10//
  
-Graphing component and the wish list regarding scaling and scrolling.  This is a steve consideration with regards to ANSI standards.+  * Graphing component
 +    * Scaling.  Steve proposes to follow [[ezfit:ANSI:ANSI S3.22 Hearing Aid Test Standard]] (Section 6.1).
  
-Steve:  ACTION make data sets for graphing purposes.  +  * User Interface: 
 +    * Scale back/remove pink change background to pink.  --- //[[smayr@audina.net|Siegwart Mayr]] 2010/06/18 17:10//
  
-Next meeting to be June 21 2010.  +  * Primary Priorities: 
 +    * Basic functionality for instrument fitting. 
 +    * Support for a subset of instruments: 
 +      * Flx 
 +      * Intellio 
 +      * Intuition 12 
 +      * Sparo 12 
 +  * Secondary Priorities: 
 +    * Support for additional products (need to review product list required). 
 +    * Support for Languages: 
 +      * Localization not for April 2011 release.  Scheduled for Dec 2011. 
 +      * It is a fairly complex process.   
 +      * Tools will be built for the translation portion to be handled.     
 +      * If localization is a top priority requirement, then we would need to address this issue.   
 +      * How quickly would it be to implement it after that?   
 +    * Support for Skins/Themes: 
 +      * Priority is set for the Dec 2011 release.
  
  
-GOALS: +== Conclusion ==
- Chart graphing priority +
-Naming +
- Functionality  +
- Workflow +
- Ex. Read instrument button… +
- Search database by pt name, serial number etc.  +
- Priority list +
- Ex. Language localization +
- Need to rethink on how to do this and be able to edit in an easy manner  is  +
- there a better way than multilizer +
- web people and marketing design input+
  
-NEXT MEETING   JUNE 21, 2010 AT 2PM+  * Next meeting: Jun 21, 2010, 2pm 
 +  * Chart graphing = priority 
 +  * Naming: 
 +    * Functionality  
 +    * Workflow 
 +      * Ex. Read instrument button 
 +      * Search database by patient name, serial number etc.  
 +    * Priority list 
 +      * Ex. Language localization 
 +        * Need to rethink on how to do this and be able to edit in an easy manner 
 +        * Is there a better way than Multilizer for localization? 
 +  * web people and marketing design input